Arunachal Capital Police Refutes Gumin Mize Arrest Allegations

By Naitik Pathak

Published On: June 11, 2026

Arunachal Capital Police Refutes Gumin Mize Arrest Allegations
---Advertiment ---
Arunachal Capital Police has issued a firm response to claims surrounding the Gumin Mize arrest allegations, dismissing them as unfounded following a detailed internal investigation. The statement, released on June 11, 2026, addresses concerns raised after the activist’s detention and highlights efforts to counter threats on social media.

At a glance

  • Gumin Mize was arrested on May 20 at Itanagar Police Station.
  • The arrest linked to a case registered at Bihpuria Police Station in Assam.
  • Capital Police conducted an enquiry ordered on May 26.
  • Officials found no evidence supporting allegations against officers.
  • Legal action initiated against individuals issuing threats online.

Timeline of the Case

Events began with the arrest of Gumin Mize on May 20, 2026, at Itanagar Police Station. Police acted on a criminal case registered at Bihpuria Police Station in Assam (Case No. 72/2026), involving provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and the Arms Act.

Following the arrest, various allegations emerged through social media posts, public briefings, and press statements. These included claims about instructions given to an Assam police officer and handling of Mize’s vehicle and arms licence.

In response to the seriousness of these claims, the Superintendent of Police (SP), Capital, ordered a detailed enquiry on May 26. The investigation examined witnesses, reviewed CCTV footage, analyzed digital evidence, and verified other technical and documentary materials.

On June 11, Capital Police publicly shared the findings. The enquiry concluded that the allegations against the Officer-in-Charge of Itanagar Police Station, the arrest team, and other Arunachal Pradesh Police personnel were baseless.

Official Response and Enquiry Findings

Capital Police described the claims as “baseless, incorrect and fictitious.” No evidence emerged to support accusations that the Itanagar Officer-in-Charge instructed an Assistant Superintendent of Police in Assam’s Lakhimpur district to assault Mize during custody. Similarly, claims regarding the transport of Mize’s vehicle or withholding of his arms licence lacked substantiation.

The SP Capital personally briefed Gumin Mize on the enquiry results and presented relevant evidence. According to the police statement, Mize appeared satisfied with the outcome. Officers advised him to pursue any concerns related to unlawful activities, including drug-related issues, strictly through legal channels rather than taking matters into his own hands.

Concerns Over Social Media Threats

In parallel, authorities expressed concern about threats directed at police personnel via fake social media accounts. Monitoring teams identified posts and comments on platforms such as Facebook and WhatsApp groups. These included plans to attack Itanagar Police Station, assault the Officer-in-Charge, burn his residence, and harm family members, along with direct and indirect death threats.

Capital Police condemned these actions as unlawful and intimidating. They emphasized that family members should not face targeting due to official duties performed by officers. Fake accounts have been traced, and legal proceedings against those responsible are underway.

The statement urged the public to cooperate with law enforcement and avoid spreading unverified information or inflammatory content online. It concluded with a clear position: wrongdoing by anyone—police or public—would face strict legal consequences.

Key Facts Summary

Item Details
Date of Arrest May 20, 2026
Duration/Context Linked to Assam case (Bihpuria PS Case 72/2026)
Location Itanagar Police Station, Arunachal Pradesh
Organizer/Subject Activist Gumin Mize
Main Issue Raised Allegations of misconduct by Arunachal police
Official Response Internal enquiry found claims baseless; briefing provided
Reported Impact Social media threats identified; legal action initiated

What Residents and Businesses Should Expect Next

  • Continued monitoring of social media for threats, with potential further legal actions.
  • Emphasis on verified information sharing to support law enforcement efforts.
  • The source did not specify additional operational changes or public advisories beyond cooperation requests.
  • Routine police procedures in ongoing cases will proceed according to law.
  • Public urged to report threats through official channels rather than unverified platforms.

Why Clear Communication Matters in Regional Governance

Context (general): In areas like Arunachal Pradesh, effective coordination between law enforcement agencies across state borders helps maintain public trust. Transparent handling of complaints, as described in official statements, supports accountability while addressing security concerns.

The case highlights the role of internal enquiries in resolving disputes promptly. It also underscores challenges posed by online misinformation and threats, which can affect community relations and officer safety.

Terminology note: Bihpuria refers to a location in Assam’s Lakhimpur district, where the original criminal case against Mize was registered.

Conclusion

The Arunachal Capital Police response on June 11 effectively closed the chapter on the Gumin Mize arrest allegations by declaring them unfounded after thorough review. With the activist briefed and satisfied per official accounts, focus now shifts to addressing online threats and ensuring legal processes continue. This development aims to reinforce confidence in police procedures while discouraging vigilante actions or inflammatory online behavior in the capital region.

Hashtags:-  #GuminMizeCase #ArunachalPolice #ItanagarNews #PoliceEnquiry #SocialMediaThreats #ArunachalPradesh #CapitalPolice #LawAndOrder #BihpuriaCase #FakeAccounts #LegalAction #NortheastIndia #PoliceStatement #PublicSafety #VerifiedNews

Leave a Comment